Monthly Archives: April 2002


This is just a little odd


I just did this little interview… Thought I might as well share it here:

1. Do you believe there is an existing line between what is mutilation and what is positive body modification? How do you define mutilation and modification?

To me, mutilation is a non-consensual act. By non-consensual I mean that the person wasn't able to exercise personal control over the decision, be it because it was forced on them by someone else, or be it by their own mental defect.

Body modification, at least as it is presented on BME, is a positive act that people consciously and consensually choose for themselves, in an attempt to improve their lives on a personal level.

2. How can extreme body modification (ie implants, silicone injection, nullification) be beneficial or detrimental to a person?

The “extremeness” of a modification is not relevant to discussing whether that modification is beneficial or not.

3. What is your viewpoint on the issue of childhood genital mutilation (female/male circumcision etc.), or the issue of parents making the decision to have these procedures performed on their children?

I don't believe that anyone — parent or not — has the right to perform non-consensual elective (as in not medically required) surgery on someone else, let alone a child! Mutilating a child like this, be it female genital mutilation, male circumcision, or even ear piercing, is in my opinion rape, and I believe parents should be criminally charged when they do it.

4. What is the reasoning behind getting extreme modifications?

Again, your implication that somehow the reasoning behind “extreme” modifications is somehow different or less reasonable than for “mainstream” modifications is in my opinion baseless. The reasons why for extreme modifications are not really any different than other modifications (type “why” into the BME Body Glossary for a few of them).

5. Doesn't society have the obligation to protect or stop people from doing these types of modifications?

Society has no right to tell people what they can and can't to do themselves. Telling someone they can't pierce their own genitals is just as bad as forcing them to pierce them. In my opinion, government has jurisdiction over public spaces, and over our interactions with fellow citizens. Government has no right to attempt to impose laws that take away our control over our own bodies.

6. Is society's attitude changing towards extreme modification as it becomes more accepting of less extreme mods (navel, ear, & eyebrow piercing etc.)?

Modern media has certainly made people more open-minded to alien concepts in general, but this is by no means limited to body modification. We are more open minded to foreign culture and media, to alternative sexuality, to music and art of all kinds, and so on.

As we evolve as sentient beings, we can not ignore the truth that every color in the rainbow carries beauty, and that it is in our collective best interest to encourage cultural diversity, including body modification.

7. What do you think about laws governing the practice of these modifications? Should they be changed?

Society needs to balance two factors:

a. We need to protect the right of the individual to exercise complete control over their bodies, as they see fit.
b. We need to protect individuals from harm, both from others, and, to a lesser extent, from themselves.

In my opinion, this means that we need to regulate practitioners. Overall I think society has done a surprisingly good job instituting laws on the subject. Most areas now have laws mandating proper sterility, as well as making sure that more dangerous procedures stay in the hands of doctors, not amateurs.

However, I believe that we do have one massive missing piece of legislation. Most Western countries have laws protecting freedom of speech and freedom of religion. I believe we need to add freedom of expression as a fundamental human right. I am extremely disturbed when I see mainstream society attempting to attack legitimate and healthy forms of expression such as tattooing and piercing via dress code and hiring policies. It's very wrong, and in my opinion, very dangerous.

8. Is there a way to tell between a person who wants an extreme modification for safe reasons and a person who does not? If not, should there be?

Identifying a mentally unstable person, especially one that's unstable enough to mutilate themselves, is not particularly difficult. However, I worry that many health professionals simply do not have the experience required to properly assess the motivation and meaning behind most body modification. (And some may be blinded by their own prejudices as well.)

Piercing and tattoo studios are in general owned by friendly and open people who care deeply for the community around them. Health professionals have a responsibility to sit down with these artists and learn from them so that we can all move forward positively together.


It's fairly regularly said that young people shouldn't get pierced because “their bodies are still growing”. I think I've even said that at times… But let's be honest — that's a politically correct lie that serves to further our cultural notions of adulthood, not any medical truth.

Let's step through a few common piercings that younger people want, and assess what changes that part of the body goes through from early/mid teens to adulthood (note: I'm not talking about babies and pre-pubescent children, as their bodies are obviously going through dramatic changes):

  • Ears – It would be ludicrous to suggest that there is any significant anatomical change in ears over time.
  • Tongue – There are obviously no physical changes in tongue anatomy from young teen to adult.
  • Eyebrow – Given that your eyebrows don't shift all over your face, why would a piercing?
  • Lip/Labret – Again, one can't seriously propose that there are physical changes so dramatic so as to make a piercing change? I don't know about you, but my lips are the same as they were when I was a kid.
  • Nostril/Septum – It's not going to make a damn bit of difference how young they are.
  • Navel – My navel is in the same spot as it was when I was a kid. More seriously though, any physical changes in the navel from young teen to adult are no more extreme than normal weight fluctuations in an adult.
  • Nipple – OK, here I agree. Especially for female nipples, until the changes of puberty are complete, nipples or their development could be damaged by piercing. As far as when that is, it's going to vary from person to person — in general that's probably between 13 and 17 years of age.

Now… I think a more important thing to address is whether a person is intellectually and emotionally mature enough to handle a piercing. Judging by the experiences on BME, immature people come in all ages, and it's not uncommon to see a fifteen year old that's far more able to handle their piercing than some twenty-five year old. More important questions that body growth include:

  • Is the person able to commit to taking care of the piercing? Some piercings, such as navels, are not that easy to heal, and it is a serious commitment and shouldn't be taken lightly.
  • Does the person understand the social implications of their piercing, and are they mature enough to accept those consequences?
  • If the piercing is of a sexual nature (nipples and perhaps tongue piercings), is the person emotionally mature enough to handle it, or will it help send them down a bad path?

Anyway, young people aren't stupid. So let's try not to make up lies to keep them from getting pierced!

And now, I want to say something to the young people reading this as well… I was pierced when I was young, and it turned out well for me. But if you want to get pierced, you have a responsibility to do your research and be responsible. If you act like an ass, you're going to mess it up for other young people. If you act like “an adult”, then maybe you'll get to play a role in fighting for young people's rights.

Related link: Young Modder's Alliance

A little contest

OK, here's the contest. I've got two old pictures here — the one on the left is me at 16 or 17, and the person on the right has changed just as much. The first person to post the name (or IAM name if you don't know their name) of the person on the right wins a one year full BME membership (including IAM of course). If you're the person in the photo, you can't enter!


Mystery Man

UPDATE: Andy correctly guessed that it's The Lizardman! Yay!

Yet another career?

The CBC just asked to license my video of the OCAP/OCF protests on October 16th (and they ever offered to pay for it, so I guess that means that whatever they give me will turn into a donation to the groups in the video). I should also mention that they really liked the music (courtesy of our own Jack Sordid). I've asked them if they're also interested in suspension footage. I've got to dig thorugh my old tapes and find the Vatican performance… I really hope the camera was working…