Monthly Archives: February 2003

Ten questions

I just did the following interview for some magazine article. A few of their questions made me a little nervous as to what they're seeking to use if for politically, but I hope my answers are such that they can't be too easily twisted out of shape. The questions are in blue, my answers are in “normal”.


1. I know that each person seeks body modification procedures for their own unique reasons. But have you noticed any thread that ties most of these people together? Any common personality traits that MOST if not all of these individuals seem to have?

Years ago I'd have told you that the common thread was a sense of individualism, creativity, and personal courage. While I would still give that answer for the less “mainstream” procedures as a general truth, for piercings and tattoos I think they've become so commonplace that they cover absolutely every conceivable demographic group. The only common trait is being human.

And I don't say that as a bad thing — I think it's wonderful that humans are getting in touch with themselves.

2. Roughly how many people between the ages of 15 and 25 visit your website, are active members?

There's no way for me to confirm anyone's age, so it's hard to give an accurate answer. My informal polling suggests to me that the vast majority fall into the fifteen to twenty-five age range, although there are many, many members who well past sixty. We have a couple younger members as well, I think the youngest being twelve — although it's important to note that both his parents also have accounts, and they use the site with him to make sure that he doesn't come in contact with anything that they feel is “too adult” for him.

I tried to join, but my daughter says pierced ears and respect for kids like her doesn't qualify me as a potential member.

It's true. IAM is a closed community; sort of like a “private club” for people into body modification. BME (the main site) is open to both active enthusiasts and admirers.

3. What inspired you to start the website? And did you have any idea it would be as popular and successful as it has become? Any clue?

The web site initially was an extension and expression of my personal interests. At the time, like most other body modification enthusiasts, I felt relatively alone and isolated. I had no idea there were this many people also seriously interested in the subject. So, no, when I first started it I had no idea it would take off like it did.

4. Can you tell me about the weekend events you host, like the one featured on TLC? How often do you gather?

They're just BBQs; social gatherings. They're not really “mine” or anything like that — lots of people on the site host them in their own areas. Mine just get a little more attention because they tend to be larger and more extravagant. Personally I host about six a year I think, but there are probably hundreds of them held around the world. The site includes tools to help people organize and find events in their area. I feel it's important that this community recognize that it exists “in real life” as well as just on the Internet.

Is there a fee?

Because they're just social gatherings, it's rare for any fee to be involved since there's rarely much of a cost to the host. If there are costs involved, hosts usually make that back either by making t-shirts for the event and selling them, or simply by asking everyone to chip in a little. They're definitely not commercial functions in any way.

Do people come once or frequently? I'd just like your thoughts on what they are and who benefits from them.

I think most people go to more than one — after all, it's fun to visit your friends! That's the real core of it as far as “who benefits”. It's just nice to see your friends, especially the ones you don't get to see often (not including on the Internet).

5. How do you feel about irresponsible body modification shops and the risks they take? And how common are these hack shops in the body modification world?

Clearly they're acting unethically, and I don't think very highly of them. Thankfully they are not the norm, and on the whole they are quite easy to identify. The bigger problem is that they tend to prey on the young, since they are often the only studios willing to overlook age requirements.

6. What is the best way for people to recognize and avoid these types?

The data is out there for clients to educate themselves on the issues and risks involved — I even have a section called BME/Risks which is dedicated exclusively to this subject. By being well informed, it's not hard to identify quality artists. In addition, the experiences on BME allow people to network with other enthusiasts and in effect read “reviews” of their various options.

7. Why do you think some individuals actively choose to do their procedures on their own, in spite of the risk of infection? Is it just part of their personal ritual? Drive?

Under normal circumstances most infection risks are post-procedure. As far as contamination during the procedure, in a self-done environment, the person has complete control over the issues involved. Assuming they understand what the risks are and behave responsibly, one could make the argument that their infection risk is actually lower if doing the procedure themselves. I don't think the infection factor is a major player, again, assuming the person acts responsibly.

As far as why someone would choose to do it themselves, there are a lot of reasons. Some people misguidedly choose it because it's less expensive (cost should never be a factor in my opinion). Others choose it because they don't have access to a qualified practitioner (not everyone lives in a major urban metropolis, and others live in an area where they don't have legal access, often due to age), and still others choose it because they are shy (especially in the case of genital work). Some people might pick it, as you said, because they want to integrate it into a personal ritual that doesn't “fit” into a studio environment (couples piercing each other in a sexual context for example).

I'd say that going to a qualified practitioner is usually the best decision. However, these are personal acts, and I certainly support others' rights to perform them in the way they feel will be best for them.

8. Some people believe body modification is an almost evolutionary call — a primal connection between mankind past and mankind present. Do you believe it's something fundimental that calls you to this art form?

I think the desire to self-decorate and manipulate one's form, as well as the drive to go through sensual events and rites of passage is an inherent universal human drive. We all express these drives on some level; in “our” case we choose to make permanent pseudo-surgical changes to the body, and to utilize the body directly in our rituals. Other people might “play it safe” by instead expressing themselves through fashion, makeup, and hairstyle, and through more common (and typically more self-destructive) “coming-of-age” rituals such as drunk driving and unprotected sex.

Personally I prefer the route we have chosen because I believe it is the most revelatory; that is, the most knowledge about the self, as well as our relationship with the larger whole, is gained.

9. Why do you think so many people over 35 are frightened by this form of self expression? And how can that fear be answered and addressed?

As I said, BME has tons of readers over thirty-five. I don't think it has anything to do with age. I think it's simply fear of the unfamiliar… To oversimplify, it's the same as being afraid of a person of another race before you've had the chance to get to know them and realize that under their skin they're the same kind of human as you are.

Body modification is a personal act. In general it only directly affects the individual that's doing it. As such, it's nothing to be afraid of. Even if it's not for you, it's important to realize that it can be a positive influence on someone's life, and we should respect their right to indulge in it.

10. What's your personal history with piercing and body modifications? What pulled you into the fold?

One day I realized that I was a human being, not a robot. I was probably about twelve at the time, and it's one of the most important revelations I've ever had. Now I do what I can to help other people do the same, in their own ways.

February 4th 2003

There's not a ton of new stuff in the BME newsfeed, but especially for IAM's rapidly growing transgender community, this story about an Indian eunuch who recently won a mayoral election but has been denied because of his gender may be interesting.

In other news, I thought this tattoo removal story (well, transcript) really sucked. Not because I have a problem with tattoo removal, but because this woman said that having her children's initials tattooed on her leg was a “negative image” and would damage her career (she owns a restaurant with a number of tattooed employees) — although she does say that her children were hurt by the decision. So ignoring the specifics, the larger statement she's sending is that she cares more about her restaurants stuck-up customers than she does for her kids. Nice.

I was reading one of the latest issues of BURST magazine (a Japanese magazine that regularly covers tattoos and body modification in general), and I came across the ad you see on the right. You've probably seen similar ads in American magazines as well; the companies selling bulk jewelry at rock-bottom prices. There's plenty of them on the internet too.

Anyway, as the person who named and helped develop surface bar technology (with Tom Brazda of course getting the primary credit), it really annoys me to see companies selling what are basically glorified curved barbells. A surface bar travels parallel to the skin for its entire length, and then turns abruptly and exits the skin perpendicular to the skin at that exit point. The bars you see on the right are not surface bars and they will not heal as well as the real deal.

It sucks because then people try them, assume they don't work, and never really figure out how to do proper surface piercings. With a little common sense, they're not hard to do well… I do find it rather disturbing that even though there's an obnoxious article* on the subject plastered on the top of the surface piercing section, people continue to send in un-viable piercings that will simply reject and scar. There's no need for that!

I made a “short-list” of the things I have to do before the end of the week, in order to prepare for the trip to London in a week (lots of filming, interviews, suspensions, meets, Gumball 3000 stuff, etc.):

  • Add a newsfeed gateway on IAM so people can submit stories. I'll then also be able to set some people as “approved” so that their stories are automatically added to the feed, so hopefully the newsfeed can be maintained even when I'm not around.
  • Add a newsfeed editor for the local machines. While I'm perfectly happy manually editing the database, it's not reasonable to expect others to do so, and people need an easy way to be able to fix errors in that database when I'm not around.
  • Add a full BME control tool for the local machines. Again, I'm perfectly happy running all the maintenance tools from a command prompt, but for other people to maintain things while I'm not around, I really really have to build a central GUI that controls it all.
  • Finish the IM bot for the BME authorisation module (that is, the tool that messages you when your membership is about to expire).
  • Write a contingency guide for BME and IAM. That is, a list of all the known problems (crashes) and how to fix them. This includes everything from server crashes to problem users.

I also have to write a complete BME operations manual, but I don't think that'll get done before I leave this time… So fingers crossed that I make it back alive. Assuming I do, I'll have an operations manual done before the Gumball rally, so on the slim chance that something terrible happens, everything will keep running even without me.

Anyway, on to the regular news. If you're not interested in that type of commentary, you can stop reading now; there's no more BME stuff in this entry.

In April 1980, Gregg Easterbrook wrote an article criticising the danger inherent to the Columbia space shuttle… His fears were proved correct a few years later when disaster struck. He's just written a new article for TIME called The Space Shuttle Must Be Stopped — “it's costly, outmoded, impractical and, as we've learned again, deadly”. We're also seeing a series of stories on how NASA repeatedly ignored and silenced warnings. First, I think we need to stay focused on space research. I think it's essential… But…

Ultimately here's what I'd like to see:

  • NASA's budget increased to about $100 billion a year. If we shift over some of the military spending I believe that's a viable number that can be achieved with little to no tax increase.
  • NASA's primary goal would be to offer large research grants to private corporations such as Scaled Composites, Bristol Spaceplanes, The da Vinci Project, and Armadillo Aerospace.
  • Any patents and research from these grants would be publicly shared with some limitations on their enforcement. That is, the companies would be permitted to profit to some extent, but ultimately the research would belong to all of humanity.

Most importantly I think we need to make sure that NASA remains a civilian organisation. My greatest fear in all of this is that space research moves over into the military sphere. What monsters that would unleash! We must ensure that the universe belongs to all people, not simply to those who'd subvert it into a tool of war.

Now I'd like to focus on two stores that I believe deserve your attention. The first is on the ownership of voting machines. This absolutely incendiary article makes a strong circumstantial case that voting machines in the US are rigged and owned by the powers that currently control America. Seriously, this is a big deal if it's even remotely true. What if there really are no longer democratic elections in the United States? If that's not grounds for violent revolution, I don't know what is.

In a related story, faking the voice of the people, the CSM looks at the recent phenomena of “fake” letters-to-the-editor being submitted in mass to newspapers. Let's not kid ourselves — people want to agree with their neighbours. It's a lot easier to say “yeah, ok” than to say “no” to something that you feel is the majority view.

Seriously, think about the implications of the above to stories.

They are a very big deal, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom.


* I say obnoxious because it clearly overstates many of its points. Also, since that article was written a number of piercers have been pioneering new surface piercing techniques that show a lot of promise, melding implant technique with surface piercing technique. I'm watching it with a great deal of interest!

Titleriffic

Really, I'm just fiddling with it a lot now to fine tune it and see what needs improvement and what malfunctions with odd input (so far worst case it just outputs nothing; I haven't been able to induce a full-on crash yet)… Below are some more sample maps. I can't imagine anyone except me will find them particularly interesting.


This is the same map as in the entry below, just rendered using the night-time settings. These are a few of the places I've lived in the past few years. I've also lived in these places at one point in time. These are some of the places I've travelled to in the past few years (big map test). These are all places that Rachel has lived in.

More map play

The dynamic scaling engine is up and running. Maps are being properly selected, and, at least at first glance it's VERY fast. I've been adding more functions to clean up the output (full colour selection, the ability to lock the images height to width ratio, etc.). Below is the course (as the bird flies) of this year's Gumball 3000:

Now I'm going to turn on the bots and generate all of the nighttime files as well; one of the first things I'm building is the tracker plugin, so you can display everyone who's recently come to your page. You can also tell it what time zone you're in, and it'll automatically use the night time map if that's when it's being asked.

PS. I am still in need of good non-projected maps. Specifically I'm looking for a map set that includes good high res border overlays, colored countries/states, and so on. There's got to be someone out there who has a mapping tool! Hmmm… Maybe I'll stop at Staples tonight and see if they have anything like that.

February is hard to spell


First of all, I've made the following addition to the TOS… I've done my best to write a policy that (a) serves the purpose of IAM, (b) meets the wishes of the IAM community, but (c) doesn't restrict the personal expression rights of the members… I hope this works alright, and feedback on it is still welcome of course:

Avatars

  • If you use an adult avatar (that is, a gential or breast shot, or similar photo), you must rate is as “not safe for work” in order to allow safe browsing for IAM members who use IAM in environments where adult avatars would be inappropriate. (Click the blue RATE button under your main picture).
  • Your avatar should represent you or your personality. Misleading avatars used to “get people to click” are strongly discouraged as they are both contrary to the community purpose of the site, and artifically inflate the site's bandwidth (thereby increasting the cost of the site). Most commonly this means men using naked photos of women as their avatars.
  • Pages that ignore the above will simply be taken out of main-page rotation. That is, you can still use the avatar you choose (assuming you have legal rights), but it won't be placed on the first page when you update.

Now let me tell you something that really sucks. NASA's budget is now under $14 billion annually. They don't even have enough money to upgrade the sapce shuttle in order to make it safer, although the cost of doing so is less than the giant pile of cash big business handed to Bush's election campaign.

Since Bush seized power, the defense budget has had its anuual spending increased by about $70 billion yearly (from $329 billion to about $400 billion), not to mention the $20 billion annual increase on Homeland Security in that same time period and other associated costs.

So if there's $100 billion dollars just lying around (since he's claiming to reduce taxes), is a wise decision really being made by funnelling that to war efforts, rather that valuable space research? Here are a few of the pro's, as I see them for sending that money into the space program:

  • The research it provides saves lives and improves lives for millions of people.
  • It bolsters American companies.
  • It's good for international relations.
  • It increases national pride.
  • It increases the international community's respect for America.
  • It encourages the international community to work together in peace.
  • It is the future, and any nation that doesn't embrace it will fall behind.

And here's the kicker: it's very expensive! Space research is by no means cheap. Which means that all these corporations that are currently getting very rich off the war efforts could be getting rich off the space program as well… So does that mean they prefer war?

I'm late, I'm late…

…for a very important date!
No time to say hello Good-bye!
I'm late I'm late I'm late!

Seriously, I have to get to work on catching up on an image update, and I have to be careful that any writing efforts be put into a new publisher's ring article… Any suggestions? I haven't decided yet what to write on…

Anyway, here's a nice fluff piece on tattoos (not that it says anything)…
Been seeing those more regularly.

* * *

I will briefly say that I am very sad to see that even though Bush yesterday suggested the opposite, Congress is already saying that the shuttle program will be grounded for years* while an independent investigation looks into the cause. The article also makes noises about funding** that don't neccessarily sound like good noises. I hope this isn't the end for the US space program.

Also, while I am very glad that there are dual investigations (official and independent) already going on into the cause of this accident, it does illustrate how odd it is that there still hasn't been one into 9/11…


* “You can expect the shuttle (program) will be on hold and we will be waiting for the investigation to be completed”; Remember how long the investigation took last time?
** “NASA, the administration and Congress have faced tough choices in regard to funding … There has never been enough money to do all the things we want to do in space. But that was true before this disaster and will be true after this disaster.”

Recursion

My brain hurts! I've gotten so mentally flabby on doing this type of thinking… My internet connection's been down for a lot of the day because of snowfall, so I've been tinkering with the dynamic mapping system. The problem is the size of the dataset. My tests that you've seen here have been rendered using the giant map — 21,600 pixels across. That's something like 200 meg of image to crop and rescale, so it chews through at least a second of CPU time. No big deal for my testing here, but unacceptable once it's on the server.

So how to render fast? My first experiment involves subdividing the map into 16 sections — four vertical divisions and four horizontal ones. From this 4×4 grid I create nine 2×2 submaps. Each one of those submaps is broken down again, and then their submaps are also broken down, resulting in about a thousand 2700 pixel wide images, with a final resolution of about 1km per pixel at full zoom, although it will do an infinite amount of digital zoom past that (not that it's meaningful past 200%).

Anyway, below shows a quick drawing of what I'm talking about:

Then, on the rendering level, once I have the edge points of the desired map (in radians), I calculate the area of the desired map. Then I seed the process using the world map's data. I then check to see if the desired map fits inside any of the nine submaps. Any that do are recursed again down to the maximum depth. At the end of it all, the software uses the map with the least differential between actual area and desired area. In the case of ties, it picks the most centred version.

2700 pixels across is still a fairly large map size, but I think, given the power of this server, that it should strike a happy medium. After all, if I instead went with 1350 pixels in width (my original plan), it would result in almost ten thousand images… And with every iteration the level of redundancy increases (and from a quality point of view, nothing much is saved).

In any case, if my thinking is straight on the matter, it means that a 50% resolution map of 2km per pixel (worst case scenario; most maps will render at 100% resolution) can be rendered for any rectangle on the globe). If I get ambitious I'll make the map loop (so for example, Ankorage AK and Tokyo Japan would be rendered as a tight crop, not as a world map), but that's most definitely a project for another day.

Anyway, hope that wasn't toooooo boring.