Monthly Archives: May 2004

Fuck them.

Here is the text the US government has banned Americans from seeing — details of an ACLU case challenging the PATRIOT ACT — courtesy of your friendly neighborhood Canadian (well, it's in that WP story too, so I'm not being too sneaky):

The provision under challenge allows an FBI agent to write a letter demanding the disclosure of the name, screen names, addresses, e-mail header information, and other sensitive information held by 'electronic communication service providers'.

Here is the part of the act that the ACLU is challenging (that they can't talk about). It's the part of the act that allows the rulers of America to (without warrant or cause) get info about you from your ISP — both your ISP and yourself (if even notified) are legally forbidden from revealing that you were searched. Oh, and I should note that they can already monitor all of your communications without your consent, but this lets them match it all to you, your name, and your financial records:

A provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service shall disclose to a governmental entity the -
(A) name;
(B) address;
(C) local and long distance telephone connection records, or records of session times and durations;
(D) length of service (including start date) and types of service utilized;
(E) telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; and
(F) means and source of payment for such service (including any credit card or bank account number), of a subscriber to or customer of such service when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute or a Federal or State grand jury or trial subpoena or any means available under paragraph.

Seriously. How fucked up is America that the ACLU can't even publish information like the above. What, the government can declare “secret” anything that challenges its actions? First secret trials, now even the word of law is secret and illegal for Americans to see? Wow. Americans can't even be told what their laws are, or that they're being challenged. Of course, as most of you who work at ISPs know, secret investigations are commonplace these days in America.

PS. Both John Kerry and George Bush support expanding the powers of the “PATRIOT” act if they are elected, and both of them (Kerry too) have voted to support it at every opportunity since it was first proposed. So Republican or Democratic, expect more of this after the election! Unless of course America wakes up and votes in Kucinich or at least a better Texan.

Interview archive

(Is it bad business that I am more inclined to do interviews with highschool students than “real” journalists? Maybe I'm crazy, but I believe the future is built on the actions of the young, not what old people write about them.)



What, in your experience, is the main reason that people undergo the more extreme modifications? Is it for aesthetic purposes only or does the feeling of the procedure have to do with it? How often does the feeling drive the desire to get them?

I don’t believe there is a main reason. Definitely a lot of people are doing it simply because they like the way it looks (and I think that’s a good enough reason). Lots of others are doing it because they like the way it feels, either on a simple physical level, or on a more emotional or even spiritual level.

I know a surprising amount of people that have integrated their body modifications into their faith as well. To simplify how that works, if one believes that God created humans and the world, by exploring his creation (your body) and modifying it and exploring it and playing with it, you gain insight into your body and who you are physically. Many feel this is the only hands on way that we can really get a little hint at God’s “personality”, and find it deeply rewarding on a spiritual level.

But when it comes down to it, there are a million different reasons for a million different people. Most of them are good reasons I hope.

Is there professional training for people who perform the procedures (such as skin removal scarification or branding)?

There is no formal program available, and I’d be surprised if there is any time in the immediate future. There are professional organizations like the APP (Association of Professional Piercers) as well as private groups such as Health Educators, Fakir Musafar (the only one to offer branding education), and so on that offer excellent training in elements of piercing and other modifications, but they are not complete programs (and are not intended to be), and they really only cover the basics.

Artists working in this field tend to be either self educated through a combination of reading and experimentation, or apprenticed. The apprenticeship program has a long tradition in skills like this, going back to the guilds of the Middle Ages, and I feel that it can offer a better education than we could ever devise in a “school” type situation. A few parts of the US (Philadelphia for example) have actually codified this in their body modification laws, requiring a verifiable apprenticeship period with another reputable artist.

How would someone know if the person they were going to was trustworthy? Is that mainly by word of mouth? How would you find a person if you were interested in getting a modification?

BME is a good place to start of course, because you can read people’s stories about being worked on by different artists around the world, and look at pictures of their work. The FAQs and other educational documents like BME/Risks help to build up the base knowledge that everyone should have. As with all things, the best way to get good service is to be an informed consumer. So learn everything you can before you buy!

How legal are these procedures in the different states?

Tattooing and piercing are almost universally legal, although they have different restrictions from state to state. Scarification tends to be a little gray, but is generally legal as well. Stuff that borders on surgery like tongue splitting is probably illegal when it comes right down to it, but most jurisdictions allow it to continue as long as it stays under the public radar.

What is normally used for chemical scarification?

To be honest, chemical scarification is really rare and there isn’t really a standard — and I’d be surprised if that changes any time soon.

What is used for skin removal?

A scalpel, usually a standard #11, is used for the cutting and peeling, and small clamps like mosquito forceps are used to help pull off the skin. Sometimes a dermal punch is used in specialized cases where a clean circle has to be removed.

Do people tend to stick to one kind of modification repeatedly, or do they tend try many different kinds?

In the past it was pretty common for people to stick to just tattooing — in fact, when they first started to popularize, there was a bit of a schism between the tattoo community and other modifications like body piercing for a long time (even to the extent where facial piercing was banned from early tattoo conventions).

But these days it’s getting more and more rare to find someone who doesn’t have at least an interest in piercings and tattoos together, and, at least when it comes to the kind of people who read BME, there is a definite interest in a very wide range, including things that people might not generally consider like cosmetic surgery and body building. To put it simply, I think we’re figuring out that it’s OK to make our body into any form that makes us happy, and that it’s OK to use a myriad of different methods to achieve that.

Does one procedure tend to be favored by one sex?

Other than stuff that’s limited by anatomy (ie. genital piercing, etc.), no, I don’t think there’s a gender bias for most modifications.

Is it more common for one sex to do the more extreme modifications?

Male anatomy is very suited to “extreme” modifications, so there are probably more men doing that type of work. But if you mean things like heavy cuttings, unusual facial work, and other hardcore modifications, women are just as active as men are.

How often does a person get multiple procedures done after having one modification?

Almost always. It’s rare for people to stop at one. It’s not because it’s “addictive” or anything like that (although people do tend to use that word to explain it). It’s no more addictive than, say, good music. Do you listen to good music because you are a person with good taste, or because you’re addicted?

What is the average age range of the people who get the more extreme modifications, if there is one?

I don’t think there’s an average age. If you asked me that question five or six years ago, I’d have told you that people don’t usually get extreme modifications until they’re in their forties or so, but these days it’s very common for people to have really far out and heavy modifications by the time they are in their early twenties.

I worry about this a little because it’s a very heavy burden to carry if you’re not ready for it (the plainskins do treat modified people with some distrust and fear!), and I think sometimes people get in over their head.

Animal ownership

To be clear, I don't support or condone what's going on in these photos, any more than reporters enjoy the abuse that's going on in Iraqi prisons. So I'm not interested in being lectured on it or debating it, especially given the glass house that we humans live in. If you want to be upset, direct your anger at a little tattoo studio in North Cyprus called Niko's.

If you don't like what you're seeing here, urge your local health board to include bans on piercing and tattooing of animals in your local regulations. Oh, and if you really don't like what you're seeing here (versus “false outrage”), stop eating meat, because this is nothing in comparison to that cruelty.

Want to feel warm inside?

This is in the update (later today), but I wanted to share this email here because I thought it was really wonderful.


This is my first tat. I have been waiting for this since I was little —— as you can see I was inspired by my teddy I have had since I was 3.

The rules of Survivor

Rule number one, from the CBS website, and as stated on the show:

[You may not] try to conspire to share the prize. The million dollars may be won by one and only one individual. Survivors are prohibited from sharing or making any agreement to share all or any portion of the prize.

To be clear. If you win Survivor, you can not hook up with another player and share the money, even if you didn't overtly plan it. If I was Jenna, Rupert, or any of the losing players, I'd be calling my lawyer… Although part of me thinks that's why CBS has come up with the “surprise second million”.

Amber and Rob are disqualified from winning Survivor for cheating. Since Rob's alliance is what basically threw every player off — at the cost of his own victory — it's not only a clear conspiracy, but it also means every player was wronged (and has a “case”). Rob and Amber had an alliance from the start, they played the game as a team, they controlled the game's alliances far more effectively as a pair, and (with an agreement to marry before the winner was even announced) shared the money. That is not a sole survivor, and it is not what the game is about…

…or is it?

Let me tell you about another game called the Kobayashi Maru…

Image update posted


An image update is posted, but not a big one (just over 666 images). Because I'm so far behind (the afternoon of 4/20 is where I'm up to), I'm adding pictures in the order they were sent to me (although clumped by submittor, so if you submitted pictures on 4/18 and 4/30 they'll all be in the update). Thanks to everyone for their patience, and thank you to Volatile for (again?) being the cover model, and Deletia for taking the photo.

Oh, and that is for the folks who slagged me for saying that there's sometimes a crossover between neonazis and militant edge. It's hard to believe that this is some “I didn't notice” coincidence. Having a poison free body is commendable, but if you can't keep your soul poison free as well, it's all for nothing.

Maybe it boils down to the “are they stupid, or are they evil” question? It's so hard to tell most of the time whether people behave poorly because they are ignorant, or because they genuinely are “evildoers” on some level… Anyway, I'll try and post some more images to the site tomorrow (about the same amount probably), and you can expect a very cool new feature, probably on Monday, for IAM that I think will be genuinely useful, especially to people who use forums for organizing events, suspension teams, etc.

Interviewed again

At 5/4/2004 0411 PM, you wrote:
>Shannon - Sorry I missed your call. If you could respond to the following questions asap I would be very appreciative - please know I may use them as direct quotations in my story.

No problem.

>1) Do you have a split tongue? Why did you decide to get the procedure done and where did you get it done?

Yes, my tongue is split and has been since 1997. I'd met a guy the year before from Italy that had it done by his dentist (the first one I was able to confirm as “real” and not just urban legend — none of us were sure it was even safe/possible). Then Erik Sprague (now The Lizardman) found a doctor in Albany, NY that did the procedure for him using an argon laser, and then myself and a large number of other individuals went to that same doctor (so The Lizardman really deserves the credit for kickstarting this “trend”).

The doctor who did all our procedures at this point swears up and down he hasn't worked on us and officially no longer does the procedure. Because of this I can only assume that he's gotten in some trouble over doing them and has decided it's in his best interests professionally to keep his distance.

As far as “why”, honestly, I don't know — I just wanted to do it. It appealed to me on some level, and both my own research and the doctor assured me that it was totally safe and wouldn't cause any problems. So I went for it, and of all the body modifications that I've had, it's been by far the most satisfying emotionally. I don't have a precise answer any more than I can tell you why I like certain food or music. It makes me happy, and for me that's enough of an explanation.

>2) Did it hurt?

Well, it was done under anesthesia, so no. Injecting the local sure hurt, and it was truly terrible for the first 24 hours (even with the prescribed painkillers), but after that it was no big deal. As I understand it, most people don't experience as much pain as I did.

>3) Where do most people get it done? Tattoo parlors or by physicians or surgeons?

Most people go to body piercers to have it done. It's rare for people to go to a doctor, and, as my own doctor discovered, it can result in some unpleasant professional side effects, so it can be hard to even find a willing doctor.

The main reason though that people go to piercers is that they do a better job. Most people find the results from piercers more aesthetically pleasing, and more importantly, the scalpel-cut method heals dramatically faster and with less swelling and pain than a laser-based method. However, it's quite possibly not legal, and any anesthetic use will certainly be grey legally at best. Finally, a piercer has little recourse if something goes really, really wrong.

I hope people will go to doctors, but I also hope that doctors actually are willing to do the procedure (because people will have this done — and if doctors refuse, it will be amateurs), and that they watch the results and bring their procedures up to par with what's already being done underground. It's very hard to convince people that doctors are a good option when doctors do a bad job. It's almost inexcusable that doctors can't come up with a procedure that works as well as the one that a bunch of untrained individuals invented in their basements — of course, I probably shouldn't be surprised since it's the advancements in small-studio sterility control spearheaded by the tattoo industry that's been pivotal in forcing dentists and doctors to finally start protecting their clients health with similar controls.

I should also add that a lot of people simply choose to do the procedure themselves (that is, they are their own surgeon). Many people feel that they learn about themselves by being the one holding the scalpel and find it to be a powerful (and empowering) experience — and, with so many states proposing laws against tongue splitting, self-splitting may ultimately be the only legal route available to people if doctors don't step up.

>4) Is this something that is gaining popularity in the body modification community and how long has it been around?

I've been able to document it in the West since the mid 1990s. I'm sure it was going on before that, but I can't prove it. In addition, tongue splitting is a part of Khechari Mudra, an advanced form of yoga which of course has a significant historical basis. At this point there are probably 5,000 to 10,000 people with split tongues around the world.

>5) Are there, in your opinion, any health risks to the procedure?

There are procedural and healing risks (bleeding, infection, swelling, scarring, and so on) which can be minimized by responsible behavior. As to the long term risks, in my opinion there aren't any. Once it's healed, you're fine. In a really extreme tongue split (cut really far back) you might have a slight alteration in speech, but it's going to be really limited and only people who know you will usually even notice. I laugh when I read all these dire warnings about destroying speech — that's just doctors speculating blindly, rather than people with actual experience talking.

>6) Seven state legislatures in 2004 are considering restricting the practice so that it can only be done by a dentist or physician. Do you think this is something that state government should regulate and why or why not?

Honestly, those laws are ridiculous. They're wasted money and needless political posturing that isn't serving the public in any meaningful way.

There are already laws against people who have no medical training doing surgery. Because of the racist overtones in the medical system (and government in general), immigrant doctors are sometimes unable to get their American licenses, even though they are fully qualified. This has led to the birth of a huge unlicensed medical industry, often servicing lower income ethnic communities. So these types of laws already exist and are in use. They are “general purpose” and don't require individual procedures to be named one by one.

If tongue splitting is surgery (which I'd argue it is), then there are already laws in place dealing with it. If it's not surgery, then the whole thing is a non-issue and none of the government's business. So in my opinion these tongue splitting laws are just a big waste of time and money… although they're good for people like me who encourage people to split their tongues. Because of the sheer volume of media that these silly bills have generated, thousands and thousands of people have split their tongues that otherwise would not have done so.

>Please add anything else you'd like me to know.

There's a little more info here, but it's somewhat out of date at this point http//encyc.bmezine.com/?Tongue_Splitting_FAQ

Here's a couple more articles that might be useful, although they're also dated
http//www.bmezine.com/news/lizardman/20030515.html (by The Lizardman)
http//www.bmezine.com/news/pubring/20030410.html (about a friend of mine who the military forced to have surgery to reverse his split)

Shannon

———
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” —Benjamin Franklin